<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The “Real” Advantages and “Real” Disadvantages of Having a Real Estate License in a Short Sale Flip Transaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/2009/12/the-real-advantages-and-real-disadvantages-of-having-a-real-estate-license-in-a-short-sale-flip-transaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/2009/12/the-real-advantages-and-real-disadvantages-of-having-a-real-estate-license-in-a-short-sale-flip-transaction/</link>
	<description>Weekly Preforeclosure Updates from Patrick Precourt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/2009/12/the-real-advantages-and-real-disadvantages-of-having-a-real-estate-license-in-a-short-sale-flip-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/?p=446#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Hi Pat,

Great call with Jason Medley last week, and thanks for the disclosure language you provided.  I have a question on one sentence you use, as follows: “The offer by purchaser is below fair market value.”  What is the reason/logic in mentioning anything about FMV, or even inferring that you know what FMV is?  Could this sentence possibly open you up to questions or potential problems with any of the involved parties, e.g., the short sale lenders?   In other words, while it does disclose, does this type of disclosure further insulate you from potential problems or open you up to them?

In your opinion, would the following disclosure provide a greater or lesser degree of protection for you: “The offer by purchaser is not meant as an indication of FMV, or a percentage thereof?”

Thanks, Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pat,</p>
<p>Great call with Jason Medley last week, and thanks for the disclosure language you provided.  I have a question on one sentence you use, as follows: “The offer by purchaser is below fair market value.”  What is the reason/logic in mentioning anything about FMV, or even inferring that you know what FMV is?  Could this sentence possibly open you up to questions or potential problems with any of the involved parties, e.g., the short sale lenders?   In other words, while it does disclose, does this type of disclosure further insulate you from potential problems or open you up to them?</p>
<p>In your opinion, would the following disclosure provide a greater or lesser degree of protection for you: “The offer by purchaser is not meant as an indication of FMV, or a percentage thereof?”</p>
<p>Thanks, Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/2009/12/the-real-advantages-and-real-disadvantages-of-having-a-real-estate-license-in-a-short-sale-flip-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/?p=446#comment-263</guid>
		<description>HI Pat,

Great content.  Really like your ideas, especially the recission agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Pat,</p>
<p>Great content.  Really like your ideas, especially the recission agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/2009/12/the-real-advantages-and-real-disadvantages-of-having-a-real-estate-license-in-a-short-sale-flip-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fridaycoffeebreak.com/?p=446#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Question about the &quot;rescission agreement&quot; fee.
I&#039;ve been doing a to b, b to c stuff but really like the idea of this strategy. I&#039;d like you to expand more on how that works. That would help me avoid the whole transactional funding, seasoning, etc crap that seems to bog things down.
It would also allow me to get a better price to the c buyer by eliminating a lot of my costs.
Please expand on that,
Kevin
(203) 948-9278</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question about the &#8220;rescission agreement&#8221; fee.<br />
I&#8217;ve been doing a to b, b to c stuff but really like the idea of this strategy. I&#8217;d like you to expand more on how that works. That would help me avoid the whole transactional funding, seasoning, etc crap that seems to bog things down.<br />
It would also allow me to get a better price to the c buyer by eliminating a lot of my costs.<br />
Please expand on that,<br />
Kevin<br />
(203) 948-9278</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
